|
|
Post by theditchmagnet on May 5, 2005 16:30:29 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by scottishpunk on May 11, 2005 17:49:32 GMT -5
hmmm... That's really odd...  I would like to see what information they are basing these assumptions on. I don't buy a word of it. It seems like 100% conjecture, and doesn't even follow any set logical pattern at all... whether a person believes in evolution or not ... This just makes no sense... Their understanding of genetics is pretty screwed up... Even those who believe in evolution recognise that genetics will get more and more specialized, and that, if anything, we'll have more races in the future-- not less. Besides that, the thing that gets me the most is their prediction of wars and of the lifestyles of future generations. How could they possibly know about the religious or philosophical tendancies of man 2-3 million years in the future? To me, this all sounds like it belongs in an X-Men comic, rather than a serious scientific article. |
|
I would like to see what information they are basing these assumptions on. I don't buy a word of it. It seems like 100% conjecture, and doesn't even follow any set logical pattern at all... whether a person believes in evolution or not ... This just makes no sense... Their understanding of genetics is pretty screwed up... Even those who believe in evolution recognise that genetics will get more and more specialized, and that, if anything, we'll have more races in the future-- not less. Besides that, the thing that gets me the most is their prediction of wars and of the lifestyles of future generations. How could they possibly know about the religious or philosophical tendancies of man 2-3 million years in the future? To me, this all sounds like it belongs in an X-Men comic, rather than a serious scientific article.